If there is one thing that I cannot stand, it’s intolerance. Many countries are populated by people from a wide range of ethnic origins, speaking different languages, and holding divergent views on religion and ethics. Diversity is not a new phenomenon, and intolerance is not a new human trait. The caste system existed during the time of the Buddha, and it still exists now. Barbaric practices and punishments existed then, and they still exist today in many places.
Buddhists are supposed to be tolerant, but there’s a lot of Islamophobia and prejudice among some Buddhists. Burmese soldiers are rarely pious Buddhists, but they are only able to slaughter innocent Moslems or Christians because they are ignorant of the Buddha’s teaching, and urged on by a climate of fear, hatred, and intolerance.
Tolerance should not be confused with some kind of bleeding-heart liberalism that is afraid to criticise what is blameworthy. When a country’s leaders are intolerant and stir up racial tensions, it’s disastrous for the entire nation. No one needs to tolerate what they find agreeable and supportive to their own views. It is when others hold obnoxious views that tolerance is required.
I think that most people are wasting their lives with sensual indulgence, politics, war-mongering, or other worthless pursuits, but that’s their choice. If I don’t approve of what they doing, I can do whatever I think is worthwhile and beneficial to myself and others. If others ask, ”What should I do?“ I can advise them to meditate, study the Buddha’s teaching, etc., which will be for their long-term welfare. If they don’t ask, it is nothing that I need to worry about. I can give my opinion, even unasked, but that is rarely effective.